Andrew Nickles http://www.andrewnickles.info Crawl inside my head with me, I'll show you how it feels to be ashamed. posterous.com Thu, 10 May 2012 17:51:00 -0700 A Few Thoughts on Gay Marriage... http://www.andrewnickles.info/a-few-thoughts-on-gay-marriage http://www.andrewnickles.info/a-few-thoughts-on-gay-marriage

For thousands of years marriage has been the purview of the church. A rite sanctioned, controlled and, in some cases, arranged by the church. That's all well and good BUT... somewhere along the way of America becoming what it is today, the government started giving cetrian benifits to those that are married.

These benifits include special tax rates, survivor benifits for social security, defacto power of attorney, inheritance rights, as well as specific responsibilities and obligations toward children and debts created as a result of the act of marriage.

This creates a special class of people recognized by the government known as "married".

Now, lets leave sexual orientation completely out of the discussion for a moment. Our constitution, as well as several federal, state and local laws make it clear that if the government offers benifits, rights, and privledges to one class of people, it cannot deny those benifits to any other people based on race, creed, color, age, or SEX.

This means that, by default, gay marriage is already legal in the united states. The government doesn't have the authority to prevent such a union.

The only way the government would be able to stop same sex marriage would be to stop recognizing marriage of any kind. Cancel all the benifits and rights assigned to straight couples, then marriage would revert back to the church and they could decide who deserves to experience such religious rights (rites?).

Until that happens, I don't see any legitimate reason to ban same sex couples from getting married and recieving the same rights and benifits as opposite sex couples.

If you have a legitmate argument against that I would love to listen to it. Otherwise I think it's time to admit that gays getting married was never the problem. The problem is the government usurping religious rites and practices and then being obligated to provide those same benifits to all citizens.

 

(Not original, unable to locate original post, if this is yours contact me and I'll give due credit)

Permalink | Leave a comment  »

]]>
http://files.posterous.com/user_profile_pics/349704/me2.jpg http://posterous.com/users/3sTuhVH9UuLn Andrew Nickles Stillborn Andrew Nickles
Sun, 13 Nov 2011 10:39:00 -0800 Tell me if you change your mind... http://www.andrewnickles.info/tell-me-if-you-change-your-mind http://www.andrewnickles.info/tell-me-if-you-change-your-mind

Lately I feel like I'm waiting on your word.

Waiting for the clock to turn and my heart to stop.

You don't wanna love me,

I'll only let you down.

But tell me if you change your mind.

 

Now I don't really wanna be there, if you walk away.

Don't tell me that your mind's made up now

there nothing else to say.

I don't wanna scream out but you can read my mind.

Now tell me do you feel alive?

 

You're the last thing that I think about, when I close my eyes

and when I rise up with the morning sun

you're the first thing on my mind.

But you don't wanna love me, I'll only let you down.

Tell me if you change your mind.

I don't wanna beg

I don't wanna steal

and I don't wanna taste this bitter defeat.

I don't wanna hide

I don't wanna run and I don't wanna face this world alone.

Cause my heart beats so quickly whenever you're around

and I lose myself easy

your kiss is my weakness and your love grows deeper,

leaving my chasing time, tell me do you feel alive? 

Tell me if you change your mind. 

Permalink | Leave a comment  »

]]>
http://files.posterous.com/user_profile_pics/349704/me2.jpg http://posterous.com/users/3sTuhVH9UuLn Andrew Nickles Stillborn Andrew Nickles
Thu, 10 Nov 2011 17:09:00 -0800 Something to remind you... http://www.andrewnickles.info/something-to-remind-you http://www.andrewnickles.info/something-to-remind-you

So this is it
I say goodbye
to this chapter 
of my ever changing lie

And there's mistakes
The path is long
And I'm sure I'll answer for them
When I'm gone..

So when the day comes
And the sun won't touch my face
Tell the ones who cared enough
That I've finally left this place

That's been so cold
Look in my face
All the stories it will tell
I can't erase

The road is long
Just one more song
A little something to remind you
When I'm gone

When I'm gone...

The road to hell
Along the way
Is paved with good intentions 
So they say

And some believe 
That no good deed
Goes unpunished in the end.. 
Or so it seems

So when the day comes
And the sun won't touch my face
Tell the ones who care enough
That I've finally left this place

That's been so cold
Look in my face
All the stories it will tell
I can't erase

The road is long
Just one more song
A little something to remind you
When I'm gone...

When I'm gone...

So this is it
I say goodbye
to this chapter 
of my ever changing lie

And there's mistakes
the path was long
And I'm sure I'll answer for them
when I'm gone

When I'm gone...

Permalink | Leave a comment  »

]]>
http://files.posterous.com/user_profile_pics/349704/me2.jpg http://posterous.com/users/3sTuhVH9UuLn Andrew Nickles Stillborn Andrew Nickles
Tue, 01 Nov 2011 10:35:00 -0700 What happened to the nice guys?? You did. http://www.andrewnickles.info/what-happened-to-the-nice-guys-you-did http://www.andrewnickles.info/what-happened-to-the-nice-guys-you-did

I see a lot off girls ask this question….

What happened to all the nice guys? 

The answer is simple: you did. 

See, if you think back, really hard, you might vaguely remember a Platonic guy pal who always seemed to want to spend time with you. He’d tag along with you when you went shopping, stop by your place for a movie when you were lonely but didn’t feel like going out, or even sit there and hold you while you sobbed and told him about how horribly the (other) guy that you were fucking treated you. 

At the time, you probably joked with your girlfriends about how he was a little puppy dog, always following you around, trying to do things to get you to pay attention to him. They probably teased you because they thought he had a crush on you. Given that his behavior was, admittedly, a little pathetic, you vehemently denied having any romantic feelings for him, and buttressed your position by claiming that you were “just friends.” Besides, he totally wasn’t your type. I mean, he was a little too short, or too bald, or too fat, or too poor, or didn’t know how to dress himself, or basically be or do any of the things that your tall, good-looking, fit, rich, stylish boyfriend at the time pulled off with such ease. 

Eventually, your Platonic buddy drifted away, as your relationship with the boyfriend got more serious and spending time with this other guy was, admittedly, a little weird, if you werent dating him. More time passed, and the boyfriend eventually cheated on you, or became boring, or you realized that the things that attracted you to him weren’t the kinds of things that make for a good, long-term relationship. So, now, you’re single again, and after having tried the bar scene for several months having only encountered players and douche bags, you wonder, “What happened to all the nice guys?” 

Well, once again, you did. 

You ignored the nice guy. You used him for emotional intimacy without reciprocating, in kind, with physical intimacy. You laughed at his consideration and resented his devotion. You valued the aloof boyfriend more than the attentive “just-a-” friend. Eventually, he took the hint and moved on with his life. He probably came to realize, one day, that women aren’t really attracted to guys who hold doors open; or make dinners just because; or buy you a Christmas gift that you mentioned, in passing, that you really wanted five months ago; or listen when you’re upset; or hold you when you cry. He came to realize that, if he wanted a woman like you, he’d have to act more like the boyfriend that you had. He probably cleaned up his look, started making some money, and generally acted like more of an asshole than he ever wanted to be. 

Fact is, now, he’s probably getting laid, and in a way, your ultimate rejection of him is to thank for that. And I’m sorry that it took the complete absence of “nice guys” in your life for you to realize that you missed them and wanted them. Most women will only have a handful of nice guys stumble into their lives, if that. 

So, if you’re looking for a nice guy, here’s what you do: 

1.) Build a time machine. 
2.) Go back a few years and pull your head out of your ass. 
3.) Take a look at what’s right in front of you and grab ahold of it. 

I suppose the other possibility is that you STILL don’t really want a nice guy, but you feel the social pressure to at least appear to have matured beyond your infantile taste in men. In which case, you might be in luck, because the nice guy you claim to want has, in reality, shed his nice guy mantle and is out there looking to unleash his cynicism and resentment onto someone just like you. 

If you were five years younger. 

So, please: either stop misrepresenting what you want, or own up to the fact that you’ve fucked yourself over. You’re getting older, after all. It’s time to excise the bullshit and deal with reality. You didn’t want a nice guy then, and he certainly doesn’t want you, now.

Permalink | Leave a comment  »

]]>
http://files.posterous.com/user_profile_pics/349704/me2.jpg http://posterous.com/users/3sTuhVH9UuLn Andrew Nickles Stillborn Andrew Nickles
Tue, 01 Nov 2011 00:41:00 -0700 I have never been sinless, but I sin with good intent; And I speak from the heart, so everything I just said, I meant.. http://www.andrewnickles.info/i-have-never-been-sinless-but-i-sin-with-good http://www.andrewnickles.info/i-have-never-been-sinless-but-i-sin-with-good

Damn, I haven't blogged in a while. Well, here goes:


They say you can’t turn a bad girl good,

but once a good girl’s gone bad…

she remembers what she never had.

It’s like she’s never cried,

never laughed.

She looks those men in the eyes and realizes,

there’s no coming back.


Nice guys finish last,

if they finish.

So if you think that I’ve been an ass,

mind your business.

I have never been sinless,

but I sin with good intent.

And I speak from the heart,

so everything I just said,

I meant.


Some seem to get pissed

and consider me a hypocrite.

I call those people

simpletons

who get pissed over simple shit.

Reminiscing on my past

bliss filled ignorance.

If only I could go back,

but I don’t want to go back.

I’d hope that you would know that,

I’ve never cared more.

But why care when you never feel cared for?

 

Permalink | Leave a comment  »

]]>
http://files.posterous.com/user_profile_pics/349704/me2.jpg http://posterous.com/users/3sTuhVH9UuLn Andrew Nickles Stillborn Andrew Nickles
Wed, 16 Mar 2011 08:19:00 -0700 Do you think Japan is at fault for the earthquake? http://www.andrewnickles.info/do-you-think-japan-is-at-fault-for-the-earthq http://www.andrewnickles.info/do-you-think-japan-is-at-fault-for-the-earthq

You will find, if you read newspapers from the period, that a certain type of people in the US have always blamed others for their own misfortunes and insisted that the misfortune would not have happened except that God is angry with them. It is not surprising to see this continue.

It is called Calvinism, and was brought to the US by people of European descent. People of European descent often use Calvinism to inform their morals and ethics when it keeps them from having to help others or allows them to look down on others. These same people will stop using Calvinism and utilize a different set of Christian tenets--the more forgiving, accepting, and "do-gooding" ones--when the misfortune has been visited on themselves. Well, unless it is something like 9/11, and then they will use a militaristic form of Christianity.

The main issue is that such people in the US are not particularly well educated (or ethical) and move between ethical systems in the blink of an eye, always choosing the one that benefits themselves the most, because they do not understand that one should have principals and stick to them both when they benefit oneself and when they do not. People in the US--we can look at Beck or O'Reilly as examples--do not have the courage of their convictions because they don't have convictions. They have various ethical systems to randomly select from with one main goal--me and mine first, last, and always.

Why is this at all surprising? It's been this way for a very long time. Not everyone in the US is like this, but too many always have been.

Permalink | Leave a comment  »

]]>
http://files.posterous.com/user_profile_pics/349704/me2.jpg http://posterous.com/users/3sTuhVH9UuLn Andrew Nickles Stillborn Andrew Nickles
Thu, 10 Mar 2011 14:47:00 -0800 Dear Tea Party People http://www.andrewnickles.info/dear-tea-party-people http://www.andrewnickles.info/dear-tea-party-people
chuckhistory:

Dear Tea Party People, 
Do you know what the Boston Tea Party was really about? Do you know what your party is really about? 
The Boston Tea Party had nothing to do with taxes being raised. Taxes were not raised at all. In fact, taxes were waved, lowering the cost of tea. The British upset colonists by lowering the cost of tea. They upset colonial business men who had stakes in colonial tea companies, or who feared that the British would make similar moves with other commodities. 
What happened at the Boston Tea Party raised the cost of tea for colonists.
If you really wanted to be true to your name, you would head down to your local gas station and pour all the foreign gas on the ground, you would go to your nearest Ikea and steal all the screws from furniture kits, and you would head over to your Walmart and burn it down. You would try to raise import taxes, forcing Americans to pay more for everyday goods, so as to give American factories and workers a level playing field with those in China. 
You won’t do these things though, because you are just puppets. You are being used to stop any change in any direction, left or right, because an ineffective government is good for business. 
So, in a way, The Tea Party is a perfect name, but not for the reasons you think. 
Thanks,
Chuck McCarthy  

chuckhistory:

Dear Tea Party People, 

Do you know what the Boston Tea Party was really about? Do you know what your party is really about? 

The Boston Tea Party had nothing to do with taxes being raised. Taxes were not raised at all. In fact, taxes were waved, lowering the cost of tea. The British upset colonists by lowering the cost of tea. They upset colonial business men who had stakes in colonial tea companies, or who feared that the British would make similar moves with other commodities. 

What happened at the Boston Tea Party raised the cost of tea for colonists.

If you really wanted to be true to your name, you would head down to your local gas station and pour all the foreign gas on the ground, you would go to your nearest Ikea and steal all the screws from furniture kits, and you would head over to your Walmart and burn it down. You would try to raise import taxes, forcing Americans to pay more for everyday goods, so as to give American factories and workers a level playing field with those in China. 

You won’t do these things though, because you are just puppets. You are being used to stop any change in any direction, left or right, because an ineffective government is good for business. 

So, in a way, The Tea Party is a perfect name, but not for the reasons you think. 

Thanks,

Chuck McCarthy  

Permalink | Leave a comment  »

]]>
http://files.posterous.com/user_profile_pics/349704/me2.jpg http://posterous.com/users/3sTuhVH9UuLn Andrew Nickles Stillborn Andrew Nickles
Thu, 10 Feb 2011 11:14:00 -0800 Bush. http://www.andrewnickles.info/bush http://www.andrewnickles.info/bush

Bush's own actions belie the claim that he felt remorse for sending Americans to war under false pretenses:

"No one was more shocked or angry than I was when we didn't find the weapons. I had a sickening feeling every time I thought about it. I still do," writes Bush.

A sickening feeling every time he thought about it? Really? Let's recall March 24, 2004. Washington's political and media elite had gathered at the Washington Hilton for the annual Radio and Television Correspondents' Association Dinner. As thousands of DC's moneyed establishment swells enjoyed their elegant meal, Bush was the entertainment. Bush displayed a photo of himself looking for something out a window in the Oval Office. His narration: "Those weapons of mass destruction have got to be somewhere." The audience laughed. But the joke wasn't done. After a few more slides, there was a shot of Bush looking under furniture in the Oval Office. "Nope," he said. "No weapons over there." More laughter. Then another picture of Bush searching in his office: "Maybe under here." Laughter again.

In joking about the missing weapons of mass destruction, Bush made fun of the reason he had cited for sending Americans to war and thus to death, traumatic brain injury, post-traumatic stress and maiming, turning his stupid blunder into a running gag.

What He Does Not Say:

Bush was the man in charge the day terrorists attacked the United States on 9/11. He had been warned in Presidential Daily Briefings in August that Bin Laden intended to attack US.
Draw your own conclusions about the effectiveness of Bush in protecting the United States before 9/11.

Bush emphatically assured the American people that the war in Iraq increased national security. Many conservatives believed and still believe that, even though the 9/11 Commission (which the Administration did not want to convene) showed no link between Iraq and al Qaida, and no link between Iraq and 9/11.

Nor does the book discuss the National Intelligence Estimates that showed that the US occupation of Iraq served to recruit and train jihadists, thus decreasing national security.


Bush also, though masquerading as a fiscal conservative, ballooned the national debt by slashing taxes on the rich and the energy industry while increasing defense spending. In fact. he was the first president foolish enough to cut taxes in wartime, the most fiscally foolish thing he could do. In fairness, his fiscal policies benefited the richest two percent.

Don't expect to find anything in this book about how the gap between the incomes of rich and poor has seriously widened in the Reagan and Bush years. And the percentage of poor Americans has seriously increased. This data is available to readers of the national weekly news magazines or even readers of USA Today---but not to readers of this book. Bush favored big business and especially big oil at the expense of the working and middle class, who have to pay interest on his bloated deficit.

Interesting that no conservative groundswell against deficits occurred until Obama became president.

Since his sympathies are always with the rich and wealthy corporations, he provided a drug program for the elderly that has no bulk purchasing for their meds, which would drive down their costs but also drive down the profits of big pharma.

He sponsored an energy bill with no conservation measures. And compromised protections of forests, water, and air quality--cynically calling these anti-conservationist measures Healthy Forests and Clean Air.

Again as an anti-conservative, Bush expanded presidential power at the expense of the US Constitution. For 750 bills he signed, he used the signing statement reservation by which he exempts himself and his Administration from the will of Congress. All previous presidents combined used fewer than 350 signing statements. Bush thus set the all-time record of contempt for Congress as he centralized power in the executive branch, contrary to conservative principles.

Permalink | Leave a comment  »

]]>
http://files.posterous.com/user_profile_pics/349704/me2.jpg http://posterous.com/users/3sTuhVH9UuLn Andrew Nickles Stillborn Andrew Nickles
Thu, 27 Jan 2011 23:41:00 -0800 Jesus vs. Jeezus http://www.andrewnickles.info/jesus-vs-jeezus http://www.andrewnickles.info/jesus-vs-jeezus
Media_https3amazonaws_jhklq

Permalink | Leave a comment  »

]]>
http://files.posterous.com/user_profile_pics/349704/me2.jpg http://posterous.com/users/3sTuhVH9UuLn Andrew Nickles Stillborn Andrew Nickles
Fri, 21 Jan 2011 23:46:00 -0800 Georgia Homeless Shelter Refuses to Serve Gay People http://www.andrewnickles.info/georgia-homeless-shelter-refuses-to-serve-gay http://www.andrewnickles.info/georgia-homeless-shelter-refuses-to-serve-gay

The House of Mercy homeless shelter in Columbus, Georgia, might want to go back and read their Bible. There's a passage in Isaiah they should pay particular attention to: "Share your bread with the hungry, take the homeless into your homes, clothe the naked when you see him/her, do not turn away from people in need."

But instead of following that line, the House of Mercy shelter has a rule on its books: if you're gay and homeless, you belong on the streets. Perhaps House of Mercy might consider a name change to House of Ignorance.

The CBS station in Columbus, WRBL, ran a story last week discussing two women who were booted out of the House of Mercy homeless shelter, because shelter staff thought they were gay. These were women who actually fled abusive homes, and as one of them told WRBL, she was expecting to be treated with compassion by the folks at House of Mercy.

"I was hoping that just by the name ... I was hoping for security," one of the women said. Instead, the woman says the way she was treated at the House of Mercy was unholy. "It was not a place of God."

The director of House of Mercy, Elder Bobby Harris, told WRBL that "practicing" gay people aren't welcome at his shelter, no matter how in need they might be.

"[Homosexuality] is not tolerated here at all. Let me tell you one reason why: because of the Bible, of course. And then we have little children ... We believe that Christ can change all. But when they begin to practice their acts," Harris says, there's nothing he can do for gay people in need.

Harris did not say where in the Bible Jesus gave permission to cast LGBT people out into the street, or refuse them service if they're needy or, in the case of these two women, fleeing violent homes. WRBL reached out to other homeless shelters in the area, and found that not a one, outside of House of Mercy, excludes gay people from being served. They interviewed Valerie McLain, who works at the Crisis Center of Russell County, and she told reporters that homeless shelters should be in the business of serving all who come through their doors, and not revictimizing those in need.

"We welcome anyone that is a victim. That's who we serve. We have no discrimination. We make no discrimination with anyone. We're not in the business of revictimizing the victim," McLain said.

Sounds like the House of Mercy not only needs to re-read their Bible, but they could also stand to learn a few lessons in service from other shelters in the area.

Meanwhile, here's the real kicker: the two women at the center of this controversy? They say they're not even gay, which means that the House of Mercy denied them service based on rumors or bad information. Still, one of the women told WRBL that even if she was gay, she would hope a homeless shelter would have enough compassion to help her out.

"If I was gay, and I had all these other issues and I came [to the House of Mercy], is that what you do to people going through stuff?" she asked.

Apparently so. How about sending the House of Mercy a message that this policy of excluding gay people is not only inconsiderate, it runs counter to the supposed religious teachings they hold dear. Check out the story below from WRBL for more information, and to see Elder Bobby Harris actually say on camera that it's his Christian duty to deny homeless gay people service.


Photo credit: WRBL

Tags: -->

Permalink | Leave a comment  »

]]>
http://files.posterous.com/user_profile_pics/349704/me2.jpg http://posterous.com/users/3sTuhVH9UuLn Andrew Nickles Stillborn Andrew Nickles
Thu, 13 Jan 2011 20:17:00 -0800 The 14 Characteristics of Fascism http://www.andrewnickles.info/the-14-characteristics-of-fascism http://www.andrewnickles.info/the-14-characteristics-of-fascism

The 14 Characteristics of Fascism

by Lawrence Britt
Spring 2003
Free Inquiry magazine

The 14 Characteristics of Fascism

Political scientist Dr. Lawrence Britt recently wrote an article about fascism ("Fascism Anyone?," Free Inquiry, Spring 2003, page 20). Studying the fascist regimes of Hitler (Germany), Mussolini (Italy), Franco (Spain), Suharto (Indonesia), and Pinochet (Chile), Dr. Britt found they all had 14 elements in common. He calls these the identifying characteristics of fascism. The excerpt is in accordance with the magazine's policy.

The 14 characteristics are:

Powerful and Continuing Nationalism
Fascist regimes tend to make constant use of patriotic mottos, slogans, symbols, songs, and other paraphernalia. Flags are seen everywhere, as are flag symbols on clothing and in public displays.

Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights
Because of fear of enemies and the need for security, the people in fascist regimes are persuaded that human rights can be ignored in certain cases because of "need." The people tend to look the other way or even approve of torture, summary executions, assassinations, long incarcerations of prisoners, etc.

Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause
The people are rallied into a unifying patriotic frenzy over the need to eliminate a perceived common threat or foe: racial , ethnic or religious minorities; liberals; communists; socialists, terrorists, etc.

Supremacy of the Military
Even when there are widespread domestic problems, the military is given a disproportionate amount of government funding, and the domestic agenda is neglected. Soldiers and military service are glamorized.

Rampant Sexism
The governments of fascist nations tend to be almost exclusively male-dominated. Under fascist regimes, traditional gender roles are made more rigid. Opposition to abortion is high, as is homophobia and anti-gay legislation and national policy.

Controlled Mass Media
Sometimes to media is directly controlled by the government, but in other cases, the media is indirectly controlled by government regulation, or sympathetic media spokespeople and executives. Censorship, especially in war time, is very common.

Obsession with National Security
Fear is used as a motivational tool by the government over the masses.

Religion and Government are Intertwined
Governments in fascist nations tend to use the most common religion in the nation as a tool to manipulate public opinion. Religious rhetoric and terminology is common from government leaders, even when the major tenets of the religion are diametrically opposed to the government's policies or actions.

Corporate Power is Protected
The industrial and business aristocracy of a fascist nation often are the ones who put the government leaders into power, creating a mutually beneficial business/government relationship and power elite.

Labor Power is Suppressed
Because the organizing power of labor is the only real threat to a fascist government, labor unions are either eliminated entirely, or are severely suppressed .

Disdain for Intellectuals and the Arts
Fascist nations tend to promote and tolerate open hostility to higher education, and academia. It is not uncommon for professors and other academics to be censored or even arrested. Free expression in the arts is openly attacked, and governments often refuse to fund the arts.

Obsession with Crime and Punishment
Under fascist regimes, the police are given almost limitless power to enforce laws. The people are often willing to overlook police abuses and even forego civil liberties in the name of patriotism. There is often a national police force with virtually unlimited power in fascist nations.

Rampant Cronyism and Corruption
Fascist regimes almost always are governed by groups of friends and associates who appoint each other to government positions and use governmental power and authority to protect their friends from accountability. It is not uncommon in fascist regimes for national resources and even treasures to be appropriated or even outright stolen by government leaders.

Fraudulent Elections
Sometimes elections in fascist nations are a complete sham. Other times elections are manipulated by smear campaigns against or even assassination of opposition candidates, use of legislation to control voting numbers or political district boundaries, and manipulation of the media. Fascist nations also typically use their judiciaries to manipulate or control elections.

 

 

 

Just remove Fascist and add Tea-Party, Neo-Con, or in some cases, Conservative... Doesn't it still fit? Wake up America.

Permalink | Leave a comment  »

]]>
http://files.posterous.com/user_profile_pics/349704/me2.jpg http://posterous.com/users/3sTuhVH9UuLn Andrew Nickles Stillborn Andrew Nickles
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 22:01:00 -0800 Don't want to love you anymore. http://www.andrewnickles.info/39678475 http://www.andrewnickles.info/39678475

If I could I'd close that door
It's not the way it was
And it hurts me way too much
It's uncertain that's for sure
It's time to face the facts that you don't love me back
I don't want to need you like I need you tonight
I don't want to want you and live this kind of life
You give me just enough of what I want to keep me hanging on
Don't want to fight a losing war
No need to keep trying again
Cause there's no way I can win
Don't want to love you anymore

Permalink | Leave a comment  »

]]>
http://files.posterous.com/user_profile_pics/349704/me2.jpg http://posterous.com/users/3sTuhVH9UuLn Andrew Nickles Stillborn Andrew Nickles
Fri, 07 Jan 2011 12:53:00 -0800 19 Facts About The Deindustrialization Of America That Will Blow Your Mind « Dylan Ratigan http://www.andrewnickles.info/19-facts-about-the-deindustrialization-of-ame http://www.andrewnickles.info/19-facts-about-the-deindustrialization-of-ame

The United States is rapidly becoming the very first “post-industrial” nation on the globe.  All great economic empires eventually become fat and lazy and squander the great wealth that their forefathers have left them, but the pace at which America is accomplishing this is absolutely amazing.  It was America that was at the forefront of the industrial revolution.  It was America that showed the world how to mass produce everything from automobiles to televisions to airplanes.  It was the great American manufacturing base that crushed Germany and Japan in World War II.  But now we are witnessing the deindustrialization of America.  Tens of thousands of factories have left the United States in the past decade alone.  Millions upon millions of manufacturing jobs have been lost in the same time period.  The United States has become a nation that consumes everything in sight and yet produces increasingly little.  Do you know what our biggest export is today?  Waste paper.  Yes, trash is the number one thing that we ship out to the rest of the world as we voraciously blow our money on whatever the rest of the world wants to sell to us.  The United States has become bloated and spoiled and our economy is now  just a shadow of what it once was.  Once upon a time America could literally outproduce the rest of the world combined.  Today that is no longer true, but Americans sure do consume more than anyone else in the world.  If the deindustrialization of America continues at this current pace, what possible kind of a future are we going to be leaving to our children?

Any great nation throughout history has been great at making things.  So if the United States continues to allow its manufacturing base to erode at a staggering pace how in the world can the U.S. continue to consider itself to be a great nation?  We have created the biggest debt bubble in the history of the world in an effort to maintain a very high standard of living, but the current state of affairs is not anywhere close to sustainable.  Every single month America does into more debt and every single month America gets poorer.

So what happens when the debt bubble pops?

The deindustrialization of the United States should be a top concern for every man, woman and child in the country.  But sadly, most Americans do not have any idea what is going on around them.

For people like that, take this article and print it out and hand it to them.  Perhaps what they will read below will shock them badly enough to awaken them from their slumber.

The following are 19 facts about the deindustrialization of America that will blow your mind….

#1 The United States has lost approximately 42,400 factories since 2001.

#2 Dell Inc., one of America’s largest manufacturers of computers, has announced plans to dramatically expand its operations in China with an investment of over $100 billion over the next decade.

#3 Dell has announced that it will be closing its last large U.S. manufacturing facility in Winston-Salem, North Carolina in November.  Approximately 900 jobs will be lost.

#4 In 2008, 1.2 billion cellphones were sold worldwide.  So how many of them were manufactured inside the United States?  Zero.

#5 According to a new study conducted by the Economic Policy Institute, if the U.S. trade deficit with China continues to increase at its current rate, the U.S. economy will lose over half a million jobs this year alone.

#6 As of the end of July, the U.S. trade deficit with China had risen 18 percent compared to the same time period a year ago.

#7 The United States has lost a total of about 5.5 million manufacturing jobs since October 2000.

#8 According to Tax Notes, between 1999 and 2008 employment at the foreign affiliates of U.S. parent companies increased an astounding 30 percent to 10.1 million. During that exact same time period, U.S. employment at American multinational corporations declined 8 percent to 21.1 million.

#9 In 1959, manufacturing represented 28 percent of U.S. economic output.  In 2008, it represented 11.5 percent.

#10 Ford Motor Company recently announced the closure of a factory that produces the Ford Ranger in St. Paul, Minnesota. Approximately 750 good paying middle class jobs are going to be lost because making Ford Rangers in Minnesota does not fit in with Ford’s new “global” manufacturing strategy.

#11 As of the end of 2009, less than 12 million Americans worked in manufacturing.  The last time less than 12 million Americans were employed in manufacturing was in 1941.

#12 In the United States today, consumption accounts for 70 percent of GDP. Of this 70 percent, over half is spent on services.

#13 The United States has lost a whopping 32 percent of its manufacturing jobs since the year 2000.

#14 In 2001, the United States ranked fourth in the world in per capita broadband Internet use.  Today it ranks 15th.

#15 Manufacturing employment in the U.S. computer industry is actually lower in 2010 than it was in 1975.

#16 Printed circuit boards are used in tens of thousands of different products.  Asia now produces 84 percent of them worldwide.

#17 The United States spends approximately $3.90 on Chinese goods for every $1 that the Chinese spend on goods from the United States.

#18 One prominent economist is projecting that the Chinese economy will be three times larger than the U.S. economy by the year 2040.

#19 The U.S. Census Bureau says that 43.6 million Americans are now living in poverty and according to them that is the highest number of poor Americans in the 51 years that records have been kept.

So how many tens of thousands more factories do we need to lose before we do something about it?

How many millions more Americans are going to become unemployed before we all admit that we have a very, very serious problem on our hands?

How many more trillions of dollars are going to leave the country before we realize that we are losing wealth at a pace that is killing our economy?

How many once great manufacturing cities are going to become rotting war zones like Detroit before we understand that we are committing national economic suicide?

The deindustrialization of America is a national crisis.  It needs to be treated like one.

If you disagree with this article, I have a direct challenge for you.  If anyone can explain how a deindustrialized America has any kind of viable economic future, please do so below in the comments section.

America is in deep, deep trouble folks.  It is time to wake up.

Permalink | Leave a comment  »

]]>
http://files.posterous.com/user_profile_pics/349704/me2.jpg http://posterous.com/users/3sTuhVH9UuLn Andrew Nickles Stillborn Andrew Nickles
Fri, 07 Jan 2011 12:48:00 -0800 Free Market Fraud « Dylan Ratigan http://www.andrewnickles.info/free-market-fraud-dylan-ratigan http://www.andrewnickles.info/free-market-fraud-dylan-ratigan

At first glance, the December jobs report seems to be a step in the right direction. An unemployment rate of 9.4 percent, the lowest level in 19 months. And a president, happy to boast about another 103,000 jobs being created last month.

However, renowned economist Peter Morici points out two important caveats. For one, 260,000 Americans simply dropped out of the labor force in December. They are out of work, yet no longer counted as unemployed by the government. And secondly, 103,000 jobs is nowhere near the number of jobs we need to be adding each month. To bring unemployment down to 6 percent by 2013, businesses need to hire an average of 350,000 new workers each month.

Even Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, who continues to defend his Quantitative Easing (aka money-printing) program, couldn’t ignore the writing on the wall during a Senate hearing Friday morning. “If we continue at this pace”, said Bernanke, “we are not going to see sustained declines to the unemployment rate.”

This “pace” that we’re operating at is working out just fine for the incumbent power structure, but it is strangling the rest of America. And it’s not the first time a group of outdated industries has controlled our government for their own benefit, and at the detriment of everyone else.

It took a courageous — and at the time crazy — leader by the name of Teddy Roosevelt to step up and change that. He took on the biggest financial giant there was, JP Morgan, and he won. Roosevelt’s underlying premise — if you’re too powerful and you’re profiting at the expense of the American people — then you are an enemy of freedom and the government must break you up. It was that simple.

Here we find ourselves today in a similar situation, where six industries have a stranglehold over Washington. And the draining of our current and future wealth will only continue as both the media and the political class not only tolerates but spreads the phrase “free market” when the reality doesn’t match the rhetoric.

Our politicians continue to take money from massive corporations to subsidize them in a rigged marketplace that only cares about protecting the incumbent structure. At the same time, the American people are drowning in a red sea of debt caused by perpetuating banking, health care, energy and defense systems that are expensive, ineffective and protected from competition.

So I have a challenge for those so-called free market Republicans who rode a wave of voter discontent into Washington. I challenge you to end massive corporate subsidies. To end tax loopholes. And to end rigged trade with China and release the true power of free markets.

This can no longer be simply a talking point to win votes. Because this broken system is not only costing American jobs… it’s costing us the very prosperity and freedoms that this country was founded on.

Permalink | Leave a comment  »

]]>
http://files.posterous.com/user_profile_pics/349704/me2.jpg http://posterous.com/users/3sTuhVH9UuLn Andrew Nickles Stillborn Andrew Nickles
Tue, 21 Dec 2010 19:22:00 -0800 America: The Grim Truth.... Interesting read. http://www.andrewnickles.info/america-the-grim-truth-interesting-read http://www.andrewnickles.info/america-the-grim-truth-interesting-read

Americans, I have some bad news for you:

You have the worst quality of life in the developed world – by a wide margin.

If you had any idea of how people really lived in Western Europe, Australia, New Zealand, Canada and many parts of Asia, you’d be rioting in the streets calling for a better life. In fact, the average Australian or Singaporean taxi driver has a much better standard of living than the typical American white-collar worker.

I know this because I am an American, and I escaped from the prison you call home.

I have lived all around the world, in wealthy countries and poor ones, and there is only one country I would never consider living in again: The United States of America. The mere thought of it fills me with dread.

Consider this: you are the only people in the developed world without a single-payer health system. Everyone in Western Europe, Japan, Canada, Australia, Singapore and New Zealand has a single-payer system. If they get sick, they can devote all their energies to getting well. If you get sick, you have to battle two things at once: your illness and the fear of financial ruin. Millions of Americans go bankrupt every year due to medical bills, and tens of thousands die each year because they have no insurance or insufficient insurance. And don’t believe for a second that rot about America having the world’s best medical care or the shortest waiting lists: I’ve been to hospitals in Australia, New Zealand, Europe, Singapore, and Thailand, and every one was better than the “good” hospital I used to go to back home. The waits were shorter, the facilities more comfortable, and the doctors just as good.

This is ironic, because you need a good health system more than anyone else in the world. Why? Because your lifestyle is almost designed to make you sick.

Let’s start with your diet: Much of the beef you eat has been exposed to fecal matter in processing. Your chicken is contaminated with salmonella. Your stock animals and poultry are pumped full of growth hormones and antibiotics. In most other countries, the government would act to protect consumers from this sort of thing; in the United States, the government is bought off by industry to prevent any effective regulations or inspections. In a few years, the majority of all the produce for sale in the United States will be from genetically modified crops, thanks to the cozy relationship between Monsanto Corporation and the United States government. Worse still, due to the vast quantities of high-fructose corn syrup Americans consume, fully one-third of children born in the United States today will be diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes at some point in their lives.

Of course, it’s not just the food that’s killing you, it’s the drugs. If you show any sign of life when you’re young, they’ll put you on Ritalin. Then, when you get old enough to take a good look around, you’ll get depressed, so they’ll give you Prozac. If you’re a man, this will render you chemically impotent, so you’ll need Viagra to get it up. Meanwhile, your steady diet of trans-fat-laden food is guaranteed to give you high cholesterol, so you’ll get a prescription for Lipitor. Finally, at the end of the day, you’ll lay awake at night worrying about losing your health plan, so you’ll need Lunesta to go to sleep.

With a diet guaranteed to make you sick and a health system designed to make sure you stay that way, what you really need is a long vacation somewhere. Unfortunately, you probably can’t take one. I’ll let you in on little secret: if you go to the beaches of Thailand, the mountains of Nepal, or the coral reefs of Australia, you’ll probably be the only American in sight. And you’ll be surrounded crowds of happy Germans, French, Italians, Israelis, Scandinavians and wealthy Asians. Why? Because they’re paid well enough to afford to visit these places AND they can take vacations long enough to do so. Even if you could scrape together enough money to go to one of these incredible places, by the time you recovered from your jetlag, it would time to get on a plane and rush back to your job.

If you think I’m making this up, check the stats on average annual vacation days by country:

Finland: 44
Italy: 42
France: 39
Germany: 35
UK: 25
Japan: 18
USA: 12

The fact is, they work you like dogs in the United States. This should come as no surprise: the United States never got away from the plantation/sweat shop labor model and any real labor movement was brutally suppressed. Unless you happen to be a member of the ownership class, your options are pretty much limited to barely surviving on service-sector wages or playing musical chairs for a spot in a cubicle (a spot that will be outsourced to India next week anyway). The very best you can hope for is to get a professional degree and then milk the system for a slice of the middle-class pie. And even those who claw their way into the middle class are but one illness or job loss away from poverty. Your jobs aren’t secure. Your company has no loyalty to you. They’ll play you off against your coworkers for as long as it suits them, then they’ll get rid of you.

Of course, you don’t have any choice in the matter: the system is designed this way. In most countries in the developed world, higher education is either free or heavily subsidized; in the United States, a university degree can set you back over US$100,000. Thus, you enter the working world with a crushing debt. Forget about taking a year off to travel the world and find yourself – you’ve got to start working or watch your credit rating plummet.

If you’re “lucky,” you might even land a job good enough to qualify you for a home loan. And then you’ll spend half your working life just paying the interest on the loan – welcome to the world of American debt slavery. America has the illusion of great wealth because there’s a lot of “stuff” around, but who really owns it? In real terms, the average American is poorer than the poorest ghetto dweller in Manila, because at least they have no debts. If they want to pack up and leave, they can; if you want to leave, you can’t, because you’ve got debts to pay.

All this begs the question: Why would anyone put up with this? Ask any American and you’ll get the same answer: because America is the freest country on earth. If you believe this, I’ve got some more bad news for you: America is actually among the least free countries on earth. Your piss is tested, your emails and phone calls are monitored, your medical records are gathered, and you are never more than one stray comment away from writhing on the ground with two Taser prongs in your ass.

And that’s just physical freedom. Mentally, you are truly imprisoned. You don’t even know the degree to which you are tormented by fears of medical bankruptcy, job loss, homelessness and violent crime because you’ve never lived in a country where there is no need to worry about such things.

But it goes much deeper than mere surveillance and anxiety. The fact is, you are not free because your country has been taken over and occupied by another government. Fully 70% of your tax dollars go to the Pentagon, and the Pentagon is the real government of the United States. You are required under pain of death to pay taxes to this occupying government. If you’re from the less fortunate classes, you are also required to serve and die in their endless wars, or send your sons and daughters to do so. You have no choice in the matter: there is a socio-economic draft system in the United States that provides a steady stream of cannon fodder for the military.

If you call a life of surveillance, anxiety and ceaseless toil in the service of a government you didn’t elect “freedom,” then you and I have a very different idea of what that word means.

If there was some chance that the country could be changed, there might be reason for hope. But can you honestly look around and conclude that anything is going to change? Where would the change come from? The people? Take a good look at your compatriots: the working class in the United States has been brutally propagandized by jackals like Rush Limbaugh, Bill O’Reilly and Sean Hannity. Members of the working class have been taught to lick the boots of their masters and then bend over for another kick in the ass. They’ve got these people so well trained that they’ll take up arms against the other half of the working class as soon as their masters give the word.

If the people cannot make a change, how about the media? Not a chance. From Fox News to the New York Times, the mass media in the United States is nothing but the public relations wing of the corporatocracy, primarily the military industrial complex. At least the citizens of the former Soviet Union knew that their news was bullshit. In America, you grow up thinking you’ve got a free media, which makes the propaganda doubly effective. If you don’t think American media is mere corporate propaganda, ask yourself the following question: have you ever heard a major American news outlet suggest that the country could fund a single-payer health system by cutting military spending?

If change can’t come from the people or the media, the only other potential source of change would be the politicians. Unfortunately, the American political process is among the most corrupt in the world. In every country on earth, one expects politicians to take bribes from the rich. But this generally happens in secret, behind the closed doors of their elite clubs. In the United States, this sort of political corruption is done in broad daylight, as part of legal, accepted, standard operating procedure. In the United States, they merely call these bribes campaign donations, political action committees and lobbyists. One can no more expect the politicians to change this system than one can expect a man to take an axe and chop his own legs out from underneath him.

No, the United States of America is not going to change for the better. The only change will be for the worse. And when I say worse, I mean much worse. As we speak, the economic system that sustained the country during the post-war years is collapsing. The United States maxed out its “credit card” sometime in 2008 and now its lenders, starting with China, are in the process of laying the foundations for a new monetary system to replace the Anglo-American “petro-dollar” system. As soon as there is a viable alternative to the US dollar, the greenback will sink like a stone.

While the United States was running up crushing levels of debt, it was also busy shipping its manufacturing jobs and white-collar jobs overseas, and letting its infrastructure fall to pieces. Meanwhile, Asian and European countries were investing in education, infrastructure and raw materials. Even if the United States tried to rebuild a real economy (as opposed to a service/financial economy) do think American workers would ever be able to compete with the workers of China or Europe? Have you ever seen a Japanese or German factory? Have you ever met a Singaporean or Chinese worker?

There are only two possible futures facing the United States, and neither one is pretty. The best case is a slow but orderly decline – essentially a continuation of what’s been happening for the last two decades. Wages will drop, unemployment will rise, Medicare and Social Security benefits will be slashed, the currency will decline in value, and the disparity of wealth will spiral out of control until the United States starts to resemble Mexico or the Philippines – tiny islands of wealth surrounded by great poverty (the country is already halfway there).

Equally likely is a sudden collapse, perhaps brought about by a rapid flight from the US dollar by creditor nations like China, Japan, Korea and the OPEC nations. A related possibility would be a default by the United States government on its vast debt. One look at the financial balance sheet of the US government should convince you how likely this is: governmental spending is skyrocketing and tax receipts are plummeting – something has to give. If either of these scenarios plays out, the resulting depression will make the present recession look like a walk in the park.

Whether the collapse is gradual or gut-wrenchingly sudden, the results will be chaos, civil strife and fascism. Let’s face it: the United States is like the former Yugoslavia – a collection of mutually antagonistic cultures united in name only. You’ve got your own version of the Taliban: right-wing Christian fundamentalists who actively loathe the idea of secular Constitutional government. You’ve got a vast intellectual underclass that has spent the last few decades soaking up Fox News and talk radio propaganda, eager to blame the collapse on Democrats, gays and immigrants. You’ve got a ruthless ownership class that will use all the means at its disposal to protect its wealth from the starving masses.

On top of all that you’ve got vast factory farms, sprawling suburbs and a truck-based shipping system, all of it entirely dependent on oil that is about to become completely unaffordable. And you’ve got guns. Lots of guns. In short: the United States is about to become a very unwholesome place to be.

Right now, the government is building fences and walls along its northern and southern borders. Right now, the government is working on a national ID system (soon to be fitted with biometric features). Right now, the government is building a surveillance state so extensive that they will be able to follow your every move, online, in the street and across borders. If you think this is just to protect you from “terrorists,” then you’re sadly mistaken. Once the shit really hits the fan, do you really think you’ll just be able to jump into the old station wagon, drive across the Canadian border and spend the rest of your days fishing and drinking Molson? No, the government is going to lock the place down. They don’t want their tax base escaping. They don’t want their “recruits” escaping. They don’t want YOU escaping.

I am not writing this to scare you. I write this to you as a friend. If you are able to read and understand what I’ve written here, then you are a member of a small minority in the United States. You are a minority in a country that has no place for you.

So what should you do?

You should leave the United States of America.

If you’re young, you’ve got plenty of choices: you can teach English in the Middle East, Asia or Europe. Or you can go to university or graduate school abroad and start building skills that will qualify you for a work visa. If you’ve already got some real work skills, you can apply to emigrate to any number of countries as a skilled immigrant. If you are older and you’ve got some savings, you can retire to a place like Costa Rica or the Philippines. If you can’t qualify for a work, student or retirement visa, don’t let that stop you – travel on a tourist visa to a country that appeals to you and talk to the expats you meet there. Whatever you do, go speak to an immigration lawyer as soon as you can. Find out exactly how to get on a path that will lead to permanent residence and eventually citizenship in the country of your choice.

You will not be alone. There are millions of Americans just like me living outside the United States. Living lives much more fulfilling, peaceful, free and abundant than we ever could have attained back home. Some of us happened upon these lives by accident – we tried a year abroad and found that we liked it – others made a conscious decision to pack up and leave for good. You’ll find us in Canada, all over Europe, in many parts of Asia, in Australia and New Zealand, and in most other countries of the globe. Do we miss our friends and family? Yes. Do we occasionally miss aspects of our former country? Yes. Do we plan on ever living again in the United States? Never. And those of us with permanent residence or citizenship can sponsor family members from back home for long-term visas in our adopted countries.

In closing, I want to remind you of something: unless you are an American Indian or a descendant of slaves, at some point your ancestors chose to leave their homeland in search of a better life. They weren’t traitors and they weren’t bad people, they just wanted a better life for themselves and their families. Isn’t it time that you continue their journey?

Permalink | Leave a comment  »

]]>
http://files.posterous.com/user_profile_pics/349704/me2.jpg http://posterous.com/users/3sTuhVH9UuLn Andrew Nickles Stillborn Andrew Nickles
Thu, 16 Dec 2010 21:04:00 -0800 Gary Allan - Get Off On The Pain http://www.andrewnickles.info/gary-allan-get-off-on-the-pain http://www.andrewnickles.info/gary-allan-get-off-on-the-pain

Permalink | Leave a comment  »

]]>
http://files.posterous.com/user_profile_pics/349704/me2.jpg http://posterous.com/users/3sTuhVH9UuLn Andrew Nickles Stillborn Andrew Nickles
Wed, 17 Nov 2010 16:44:55 -0800 Tell Me http://www.andrewnickles.info/tell-me http://www.andrewnickles.info/tell-me

In violation of a thought of a long time ago,
impressive reasons fill the caverns of my mind
No celebration for the people that I didn't know
connected even though there's nothing left to find

Poetic justice never seems to make the world feel right
Chaotic voices in the darkness call your name
You turn away from me whenever I remind you
Of the day the sun saw through the lies exposing all the pain

There's more than I can see and there's a deeper part of me
Won't you be my inspiration help me end my desperation now

Tell me what it is I'm meant to do
I've fallen to my knees
I've shed away my tears
And lost my destiny
I sit beneath the sun
My hands held to the sky
I cannot ask a question
But still I wonder why

Permalink | Leave a comment  »

]]>
http://files.posterous.com/user_profile_pics/349704/me2.jpg http://posterous.com/users/3sTuhVH9UuLn Andrew Nickles Stillborn Andrew Nickles
Tue, 16 Nov 2010 22:25:00 -0800 Waylon Jennings - A Long Time Ago http://www.andrewnickles.info/waylon-jennings-a-long-time-ago http://www.andrewnickles.info/waylon-jennings-a-long-time-ago

Permalink | Leave a comment  »

]]>
http://files.posterous.com/user_profile_pics/349704/me2.jpg http://posterous.com/users/3sTuhVH9UuLn Andrew Nickles Stillborn Andrew Nickles
Sun, 07 Nov 2010 16:30:00 -0800 Confirmation Bias http://www.andrewnickles.info/confirmation-bias http://www.andrewnickles.info/confirmation-bias

The Misconception: Your opinions are the result of years of rational, objective analysis.

The Truth: Your opinions are the result of years of paying attention to information which confirmed what you believed while ignoring information which challenged your preconceived notions.

Source: EIL

Have you ever had a conversation in which some old movie was mentioned, something like “The Golden Child” or maybe even something more obscure?

You laughed about it, quoted lines from it, wondered what happened to the actors you never saw again, and then you forgot about it.

Until…

You are flipping channels one night and all of the sudden you see “The Golden Child” is playing. Weird.

The next day you are reading a news story, and out of nowhere it mentions forgotten movies from the 1980s, and holy shit, three paragraphs about “The Golden Child.”

You see a trailer that night at the theater for a new Eddie Murphy movie, and then you see a billboard on the street promoting Charlie Murphy doing stand-up in town, and then one of your friends sends you a link to a post at TMZ showing recent photos of the actress  from “The Golden Child.”

What is happening here? Is the universe trying to tell you something?

No. This is how confirmation bias works.

Since the party and the conversation where you and your friends took turns saying “I-ah-I-ah-I want the kniiiife” you’ve flipped channels plenty of times; you’ve walked past lots of billboards; you’ve seen dozens of stories about celebrities; you’ve been exposed to a handful of movie trailers.

The thing is, you disregarded all the other information, all the stuff  unrelated to “The Golden Child.” Out of all the chaos, all the morsels of data, you only noticed the bits which called back to something sitting on top of your brain.

A few weeks back, when Eddie Murphy and his Tibetan adventure were still submerged beneath a heap of pop-culture at the bottom of your skull, you wouldn’t have paid any special attention to references to it.

If you are thinking about buying a new car, you suddenly see people driving them all over the roads. If you just ended a long-time relationship, every song you hear seems to be written about love. If you are having a baby, you start to see them everywhere.

Confirmation bias is seeing the world through a filter, thinking selectively.

The examples above are a sort of passive version of the phenomenon. The real trouble begins when confirmation bias distorts your active pursuit of facts.

Punditry is a whole industry built on confirmation bias.

Rush Limbaugh and Keith Olbermann, Glenn Beck and Arianna Huffington, Rachel Maddow and Ann Coulter – these people provide fuel for beliefs, they pre-filter the world to match existing world-views.

If their filter is like your filter, you love them. If it isn’t, you hate them.

Whether or not pundits are telling the truth, or vetting their opinions, or thoroughly researching their topics is all beside the point. You watch them not for information, but for confirmation.

“Be careful. People like to be told what they already know. Remember that. They get uncomfortable when you tell them new things. New things…well, new things aren’t what they expect. They like to know that, say, a dog will bite a man. That is what dogs do. They don’t want to know that man bites a dog, because the world is not supposed to happen like that. In short, what people think they want is news, but what they really crave is olds…Not news but olds, telling people that what they think they already know is true.”

Terry Pratchett through the character Lord Vetinari from his novel, “The Truth: a novel of Discworld

Check any Amazon.com wish list, and you will find people rarely seek books which challenge their notions of how things are or should be.

During the 2008 U.S. presidential election, Valdis Krebs at orgnet.com analyzed purchasing trends on Amazon.

People who already supported Obama were the same people buying books which painted him in a positive light. People who already disliked Obama were the ones buying books painting him in a negative light.

Just like with pundits, people weren’t buying books for the information, they were buying them for the confirmation.

Krebs has researched purchasing trends on Amazon and the clustering habits of people on social networks for years, and his research shows what psychological research into confirmation bias predicts: you want to be right about how you see the world, so you seek out information which confirms your beliefs and avoid contradictory evidence and opinions.

Half-a-century of research has placed confirmation bias among the most dependable of mental stumbling blocks.

Journalists looking to tell a certain story must avoid the tendency to ignore evidence to the contrary; scientists looking to prove a hypothesis must avoid designing experiments with little wiggle room for alternate outcomes.

Without confirmation bias, conspiracy theories would fall apart. Did we really put a man on the moon? If you are looking for proof we didn’t, you can find it.

“If one were to attempt to identify a single problematic aspect of human reasoning that deserves attention above all others, the confirmation bias would have to be among the candidates for consideration. Many have written about this bias, and it appears to be sufficiently strong and pervasive that one is led to wonder whether the bias, by itself, might account for a significant fraction of the disputes, altercations, and misunderstandings that occur among individuals, groups, and nations.”

- Raymond S. Nickerson

In a 1979 University of Minnesota study by Mark Snyder and Nancy Cantor, people read about a week in the life of an imaginary woman named Jane. Throughout the week, Jane did things which showcased she could be extraverted in some situations and introverted in others.

A few days passed. The subjects were asked to return.

Researchers divided the people into groups and asked them to help decide if Jane would be suited for a particular job. One group was asked if she would be a good librarian;  the other group was asked if she would be a good real-estate agent.

In the librarian group, people remembered her as an introvert. In the real-estate group, they remembered her being an extravert. After this, when they were asked if she would be good at the other profession people stuck with their original assessment, saying she wasn’t suited for the other job.

The study suggests even in your memories you fall prey to confirmation bias, recalling those things which support your beliefs, forgetting those things which debunk them.

An Ohio State study in 2009 showed people spend 36 percent more time reading an essay if that essay aligns with their opinions.

Another study at Ohio State in 2009 showed subjects clips of the parody show “The Colbert Report,” and people who considered themselves politically conservative consistently reported “Colbert only pretends to be joking and genuinely meant what he said.”

“Thanks to Google, we can instantly seek out support for the most bizarre idea imaginable. If our initial search fails to turn up the results we want, we don’t give it a second thought, rather we just try out a different query and search again.”

- Justin Owings

A popular method for teaching confirmation bias, first introduced by P.C. Wason in 1960, is to show the following numbers to a classroom: 2, 4, 6

The teacher then asks the classroom to guess the teacher’s secret rule by offering up three numbers of their own. The teacher will then say “yes” or “no” if the order matches the rule. When the student thinks they have it figured out, they have to write it down and turn it in.

Students typically offer sets like 10, 12, 14 or 22, 24, 26. The teacher says “yes” over and over again, and the majority of people turn in the wrong answer.

To figure out the rule, students would have to offer sets like 2, 2, 2 or 9, 8, 7 – these, the teacher would say, do not fit the rule. With enough guesses playing against what the students think the rule may be, students finally figure out what the original rule was (three numbers in ascending order).

The exercise is intended to show how you tend to come up with a hypothesis and then work to prove it right instead of working to prove it wrong. Once satisfied, you stop searching.

You seek out safe havens for your ideology, friends and coworkers of like mind and attitude, media outlets guaranteed to play nice.

Whenever your opinions or beliefs are so intertwined with your self-image you couldn’t pull them away without damaging your core concepts of self, you avoid situations which may cause harm to those beliefs.

“The human understanding when it has once adopted an opinion (either as being the received opinion or as being agreeable to itself) draws all things else to support and agree with it.”

- Francis Bacon

Over time, by never seeking the antithetical, through accumulating subscriptions to magazines, stacks of books and hours of television, you can become so confident in your world-view no one could dissuade you.

Remember, there’s always someone out there willing to sell eyeballs to advertisers by offering a guaranteed audience of people looking for validation. Ask yourself if you are in that audience.

In science, you move closer to the truth by seeking evidence to the contrary. Perhaps the same method should inform your opinions as well.

Links:

Confirmation Bias Activity

Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises

Research in Amazon Buying Patterns

Research into Book Buying Patterns During an Election

Snyder and Cantor Study

The Complete Text of The Truth: A novel of Discworld

Ohio State Study Showing People Prefer Read Like-Minded Essays

Ohio State Colbert Report Study

Confirmation Bias and Perceived Sexual Double Standards

Justin Owings on Confirmation Bias

Finding Subversives with Amazon Wishlists

Permalink | Leave a comment  »

]]>
http://files.posterous.com/user_profile_pics/349704/me2.jpg http://posterous.com/users/3sTuhVH9UuLn Andrew Nickles Stillborn Andrew Nickles
Fri, 05 Nov 2010 20:40:00 -0700 Nine Inch Nails - Something I can never have (still) http://www.andrewnickles.info/nine-inch-nails-something-i-can-never-have-st http://www.andrewnickles.info/nine-inch-nails-something-i-can-never-have-st

Permalink | Leave a comment  »

]]>
http://files.posterous.com/user_profile_pics/349704/me2.jpg http://posterous.com/users/3sTuhVH9UuLn Andrew Nickles Stillborn Andrew Nickles